Background of the Study
Legal discourse in Nigeria is characterized by a formal register that aims for precision and clarity in conveying judicial decisions and legal arguments. Court transcripts, as written records of legal proceedings, serve as an essential tool for ensuring transparency and accountability in the legal system (Idris, 2023). However, the pragmatic clarity of these transcripts is influenced by factors such as legal jargon, procedural language, and the inherent complexity of legal concepts. This study undertakes a comparative analysis of court transcripts from various jurisdictions in Nigeria to evaluate how effectively legal language is integrated and understood by diverse stakeholders, including lawyers, judges, and the general public (Yakubu, 2024). By analyzing linguistic markers, speech acts, and contextual cues, the research examines whether pragmatic devices are employed to enhance clarity and reduce ambiguity in legal discourse. The study further explores the implications of any identified shortcomings for access to justice and public trust in the legal system, aiming to propose recommendations for improving communication in legal contexts (Oke, 2025).
Statement of the Problem
Although Nigerian legal discourse is intended to be clear and precise, there is evidence of pragmatic ambiguities in court transcripts that may impede understanding and access to justice. Prior research has primarily focused on legal theory and procedural aspects, with limited attention to the pragmatic elements of courtroom communication (Idris, 2023). This gap in the literature hinders efforts to ensure that legal language is accessible to non-expert audiences, potentially undermining public confidence in judicial processes. Without a thorough examination of pragmatic clarity, stakeholders remain unaware of the extent to which legal discourse may be misinterpreted. This study seeks to fill this void by providing a comparative analysis of court transcripts, highlighting areas where pragmatic adjustments could improve clarity and fairness (Yakubu, 2024).
Objectives of the Study
Research Questions
Significance of the Study
This study is significant as it investigates the pragmatic aspects of legal discourse in Nigeria, offering insights into how court transcripts can be improved to ensure clearer communication. The findings will benefit legal practitioners, policymakers, and the public by promoting a more accessible and transparent legal system (Idris, 2023; Oke, 2025).
Scope and Limitations of the Study
This study is limited to the comparative analysis of pragmatic clarity in Nigerian court transcripts.
Definitions of Terms
1.1 Background of the Study
Access to adequate sanitation facilities is critical for the health, well-b...
Chapter One: Introduction
1.1 Background of the Study
Education plays a critical role in skill acquisition, which is essential...
Background of the Study
Cyber threats are increasingly targeting academic institutions due to their vas...
Background of the Study
Cultural storytelling has long served as a vital tool for transmitting language and cultural value...
INTRODUCTION
Globally, Malaria is likely one of the first illnesses known to humans and has had a significant influence...
Background of the Study
Sustainable building practices are becoming increasingly important in the real estate sector due to...
Background of the Study
The success of students in higher education is often linked to early intervention when academic struggles are detect...
ABSTRACT
We have found ourselves in a situation where people all around the world who want to either lose or gain weight or just remain f...
Background of the Study
Tax revenue is a fundamental source of government income for f...
Background of the Study
Bullying in schools and online environments is a pervasive issue affecting adolescents worldwide, and its adverse...